Designable Porous Surfaces for Waterborne Contaminant Capture: A Critical Review of Metal–Organic Frameworks across Radionuclide, Dye and PFAS Domains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64354/xxjvb433Keywords:
: Metal–organic frameworks; adsorption; water purification; uranium; radionuclides; dyes; PFAS; water stability.Abstract
In just over a decade metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have gone from being a crystallographic curiosity to one of the most discussed adsorbent families in water treatment, mainly because of their geometry: a MOF is built from metal nodes linked by organic linkers, so the size of its pores, its internal surface area and the chemistry lining its channels can all be tuned almost independently. This review looks at the MOF as a tunable adsorbent surface and questions what that tunability really buys when the goal is a dissolved contaminant. We focus on three classes where MOFs have published their most convincing results, radionuclides, synthetic dyes and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and gather reported Langmuir capacities together with the isotherm, kinetic and mechanistic evidence behind them. The numbers are mind-blowing. Amidoxime- and chitosan-decorated frameworks shuttle uranium(VI) past 2500 mg/g, an ultrasound-assisted ZIF-67 pushes malachite green past 3600 mg/g, and ferrocyanide- and oxalate-trapped frameworks remove caesium and strontium out of solution with real selectivity. Almost all of these systems are described by Langmuir isotherms and pseudo-second-order kinetics with coordination to open metal sites, ion exchange and electrostatic attraction driving the capture and for the fluorinated tails of PFAS hydrophobic association. We devote equal space to the major shortcoming of the field, the variable stability of many frameworks in actual water, as also to cost and regeneration, for these are what still distinguish an elegant isotherm from a working process. Tables and figure captions are provided for immediate use.
References
1 [1] Ru J., Wang X., Wang F., et al. (2024). Design and application of metal–organic frameworks for heavy-metal adsorption in water: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research / RSC.
2 [2] Liu X., Wang Z., et al. (2024). The application of metal–organic frameworks in water treatment and their large-scale preparation: a review. Molecules, 29, 2129.
3 [3] Wang C., Liu X., et al. (2021). UiO-66 metal–organic frameworks in water treatment: a critical review. Progress in Materials Science, 121, 100792.
4 [4] Saini P., et al. (2024). Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of ZIF-67 metal–organic framework for the adsorptive removal of textile dyes. Separation and Purification Technology, 330, 125-138.
5 [5] A review of the effectiveness of metal–organic frameworks in removing dye effluents (2024). Water Practice & Technology, 19, 4699-4720.
6 [6] Sheta M.S., et al. (2023). Recent progress in the removal of radionuclides from wastewater based on metal–organic frameworks: a review. RSC Advances, 13, 25182-25203.
7 [7] Huang Y., et al. (2025). Cu-MOF@chitosan/tannic acid composite for high-capacity uranium(VI) removal. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 465, 133-146.
8 [8] Li Z., et al. (2024). Ce/Mn-doped UiO-66-NH2 for uranium(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution. Separation and Purification Technology, 335, 126-139.
9 [9] Zhang J., et al. (2024). Amidoxime-modified metal–organic framework for efficient uranium removal from radioactive wastewater. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 398, 124-135.
10 [10] Le Q., et al. (2020). ZIF-8–ferrocyanide composite for selective caesium adsorption. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 581, 741-751.
11 [11] Mu W., et al. (2019). Oxalate-functionalised MOF-808 as an ion-trap for strontium capture. Dalton Transactions, 48, 9092-9101.
12 [12] A review of removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using metal–organic framework-based nanoadsorbents (2025). Nano Convergence, 12, 21.
13 [13] Ilango A.K., et al. (2025). Activated ZIF-8-derived carbons for the removal of PFAS mixtures from water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 480, 148-160.
14 [14] Zhang B., et al. (2025). Pore-engineered porous carbon derived from a metal–organic framework for PFOA adsorption (476 mg/g). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 470, 134-147.
15 [15] Recent improvement strategies on metal–organic frameworks as adsorbent, catalyst and membrane for wastewater treatment (2021). Molecules, 26, 5261.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chemical Interactions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.